|
Calcium channel
blockers may provide an effective alternative to beta blockers
in the treatment of patients with both hypertension and coronary
artery disease, according to a study reported in the April 2 issue
of the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
As reported
in the April 2 issue of the Journal of the American College of
Cardiology, the study compared the calcium channel blocker verapamil
with the beta blocker atenolol. Beta blockers are currently considered
the gold standard in treating this group of patients.
After evaluating
more than 22,000 high-risk patients with cardiovascular disease,
researchers found verapamil to be equal to atenolol in reducing
mortality, heart attacks or strokes. Verapamil patients were also
less likely to develop type-2 diabetes than those taking the beta
blockers.
Some of those
treated with verapamil and atenolol were also treated with the
ACE inhibitor trandolapril and/or the diuretic hydrochlorothiazide.
The majority of the patients (70 percent) required more than one
medication to reach target blood pressure goals, showing that
a single medication was generally insufficient to control blood
pressure.
In a questionnaire,
more patients in the verapamil arm responded that they felt good
or excellent at 24 months. Reported adverse events were similar
in frequency between treatment strategies. Patients in the verapamil
group were 13 percent less likely to develop diabetes during follow-up
versus patients in the beta-blocker group.
Other
sources: Abbott Laboratories |