|
Recent results
from a clinical trial on treating hypertension have changed the
way physicians prescribe, and the way patients use, a certain
high blood pressure drug, according to a study reported in the
January 7 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.
In
the spring of 2000, significant changes in the recommendations for alpha-blocker
use occurred as a result of early, unfavorable results from the Antihypertensive
and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT).
That trial
compared alpha-blockers, calcium channel blockers and ACE inhibitors
to less expensive, generic diuretics for lowering blood pressure
and preventing coronary heart disease and other cardiovascular
events in high-risk hypertensive persons 55 years and older.
In
January 2000, the arm of the study evaluating the alpha-blocker doxazosin was
halted after researchers found that the risk of cardiovascular events with doxazosin
was more than 25 percent greater than in patients treated with the thiazide diuretic
chlorthalidone. The results were widely disseminated in news releases and journal
publications. After
tracking trends in alpha-blocker prescriptions before and after the early termination
of the doxazosin arm of the study, the researchers found steady increases in alpha-blocker
prescriptions and use from 1996 through 1999.
However, a
moderate reversal occurred once word got out about the early termination.
Researchers found that new alpha-blocker prescription orders declined
by 26 percent, dispensed alpha-blocker prescriptions by 22 percent
and physician-reported alpha-blocker drug use by 54 percent between
1999 and 2002.
The
researchers concluded that early termination results had a significant impact
on alpha-blocker use and noted that declining pharmaceutical industry promotion
may have contributed further to this decline.
However, the
researchers also found that the lack of an abrupt and more pronounced
decline in prescribing shortly after the ALLHAT results suggests
slow and potentially incomplete diffusion of information from
this clinical trial.
Other
sources: JAMA. 2004; 291:54-62
|